Thoughts about General Music in Elementary Classes

Music should be taught to all Elementary students on a weekly basis in whole-class groups. Classes should be taught by music specialists, standards-based and sequential. They should be at least one time per week, but twice a week would be even better.

Here are the reasons I say this.

1. Music as pullout only in 4th a 5th grade has many inherent problems. Students can only succeed if they actually go to the music classes with their instruments. They are, by design, torn away from their academic classroom. They miss direct instruction which causes students and classroom teachers much stress, and leads, very often, to students quitting music, as failing their academics is not an option parents or teachers will choose.
2. Students also quit music in 4th a 5th grade because they find out it wasn’t really something they cared much about after all. When presented in the fall with the option of taking music classes many students enroll just out of curiosity. They get swept up in the excitement of doing something outside the classroom, on their own, with their friends. Everyone is signing up, so they do too. Only it turns out, they find in a few weeks, that they don’t have the passion or desire to pursue it, and facing the struggle of keeping up in academic classes, opt out of further music study.
3. Because of the first two reasons, and also because the procurement of an instrument is sometimes out of reach for some students (and there are many reasons for this), music education under this model is not equitable.
4. Many of the VAPA standards for Music assume a General Music focus, and cannot be fully implemented in half-hour, twice-weekly instrumental music classes. Music History, cultural context, general Music literacy and creative, critical thinking are not easily addressed in such classes.

This is not to say that Instrumental Music should not be offered in the upper grades of Elementary School.  If General Music was still taught through Fourth and Fifth grade, even with a pull-out program for the Instrumental part (Which might now more appropriate to offer after school), students would know by this point whether Music is something they are interested to pursue further by focusing on one instrument for a whole year. Instrumental Music would be an enrichment supplement to the core subject of General Music. 

Currently PUSD has whole-class instruction for Third Grade Violin is, in my opinion, good, but would be better if it was cemented in the background of three years of General Music and a continuation of General Music even with the Violin instruction (one day a week violin, one day General Music)

Music is mandated to be taught at all elementary grade levels, while Instrumental Music is not. Instrumental Music instruction is, perhaps, not appropriate for every student. We music teachers can see within a few months which students are going to "get it" and which are not. There are exceptions always. There are students who hang in and struggle for the whole first year, and who suddenly seem to have light bulbs coming on all over in the second year. The secret to their success, in my opinion, is not that some kind of talent kicked in, but that they liked it and persevered. It's the liking that is more important than any congenital talent that makes instrumental music instruction meaningful for them.

In the General Music setting, Music understanding and appreciation can grow, even if students don't achieve any big success on a given instrument. They are learning, like in Math and English Language Arts, and Science and Social Studies, things that we believe all educated people should know.

Why Not Just Teach Rock and Roll

Why we don’t just teach rock and roll classes in public school instead of band and orchestra is a question posed to me this afternoon by our fearless leader, coordinator and supporter of all things art and music in our school district. She was asking because of ongoing conversations she is having with potential funders of our local public school music programs. The obvious answer has to do with the rigor involved in learning a band or orchestra instrument, working both sides of the brain, responding to written stimulus in real time and all that. But it got me thinking: What else? I know the answer to the question she posed has to do with more than cerebral calisthenics. 

For one thing, rock-n-roll has always been the go-to medium for the rebellious teenager. This is what kids do to establish themselves as NOT their parents. The less the parents like it, in some cases, the more the kids do. If we make rock part of the “establishment” by including it as part of a regular school day, we risk institutionalizing the very impetus which allows kids to come to the music of their generation on their own. Of course, I know that as a 60 year old classically trained musician I am never going to be cool enough to run a rad rock program. There are younger, hipper teachers who could for sure, and as facilitators and mentors and critical ears those teachers are invaluable. But kids will learn how to rock on their own, if they are bent that way. Nothing will stop them, and in this age of youtube and so many other online resources there is plenty of help. 

The real reason we don’t, and shouldn’t, focus on rock and roll for our music departments (and I know I sound like a fuddy-duddy even uttering that  phrase) is this: We cannot create a meaningful ensemble experience for 900 children at the elementary level and close to that at the secondary level unless we are teaching classes that allow 50 kids at a time to make music together. A marching or concert band or string orchestra is enhanced by big numbers of participants--the more the merrier. Whereas with a rock and roll- oriented class, unless you have 100 soundproof rooms and 20 teachers per school, you are not going to be able to service all the students who want to play. At best a rock band might have 7 or 8 kids in it, but usually there are more like 4 or 5. And they are loud, so you can’t really have more than one group rehearsing at a time. On the other hand, if you have 50 kids with violins or band instruments in their hands, you will slowly but surely have an orchestra or band that makes music together. This “together” is the best part of music, and yes, rock musicians play together, but not in the numbers that will thrill you if you are part of a 200-member marching band on parade day. Kids in rock bands become fast friends, no doubt, but your orchestra and band friends are a giant family, working toward a common goal. There is, to the extent that we can put instruments in the hands of every kid who wants one, a democracy to band and orchestra class and in this light, a five-piece rock band begins to look like an elitist cordoning off of talents. Not to pursue this chance for children to learn what it feels like to be part of something so big and wonderful with greatest vigor would be a disservice to our students, and this is why we need to support band and orchestra programs. 

Addendum: Since writing this, I have seen several videos of classes of 20-30 kids playing together in a pop music setting, multiple keyboards, guitars, amps, drum sets all working toward a common goal. This is inspiring and at the classroom level can be managed and give everyone something to do to be part of the whole. When I think of our district level events where we are able to hear and see hundreds of students at a time either marching or playing on a stage, this is where the band and orchestra program excels, and it is wonderful to have both experiences available to students at every grade level. 

Balancing Balance: Silver AGAIN!

Yesterday my middle school orchestra made its annual pilgrimage to the Forum Music Festival, and took home for the 5th year in a row a silver rating. This means we are in the top 20% of middle school music ensembles nationally, and for that I am quite proud. But we were sure we had a shot at the gold rating this year, and we are all a little disappointed.

What we got dinged on were things we can control, and things we can't really control, and we got dinged for things that, while they may have been less than gold to the judges, represented HUGE improvements over the course of this past year.

Number one on the judges' written comments had to do with balance. This is something we struggle with constantly due to the size and make-up of our orchestra. In a group of 45, there are 20 strings, 20 winds and 5 percussionists. 6 first violins, 9 seconds, 2 violas, 2 cellos and a bass. We also have for the first time 2 trombones AND a tuba and a couple pretty decent piano players. A horn, 3 alto saxes, a tenor sax, 3 trumpets and 4 clarinets round it all out. So balance is always a challenge. The alto saxes alone can drown out the violins without even trying. Our balance has improved over this year. The kids are sensitive to their part in the whole sound, but they don't always have the skill level to achieve the sounds needed. How does a tenor sax fit into the sound of a symphony orchestra anyway? The cheap violins some of the kids are playing on came from nameless online places without proper setup and crummy bows. Almost all the string instruments are strung up with old strings. Some don't sound that great. I tuned every string instrument myself, and we got dinged for having out-of-tune open strings. They wanted the strings to use more bow. And all I can think is: they should have seen how much bow they used to not use!

Forum Festivals did send around an email/newsletter a while back with some tips about how to improve the sound of any ensemble. We took those suggestions to heart and learned how to breath together, how to listen for the melody and back off if you don't have it, how to start and release together. We talked about and worked on bow placement. We worked on dynamics, and did receive a compliment about that. The percussionists learned how to work together. We worked on breathing, keeping lines going. Everywhere and at all times we fine-tuned pitch. We learned about subdividing beats and finishing phrases. We matched note length and articulation. We got all the bows moving in the same direction.

I haven't listened to the recorded comments yet, but I am really hoping to hear some acknowledgement of those accomplishments.The kids and know what we've done. We know where we were in August, and we know how far we have come. Maybe it would be a neat thing to have a fall festival, where the same judges hear you and then hear you again in the spring to see how much progress has been made. That probably won't ever happen, but thinking about that progress over the course of the year does help me stay focused on doing well for its own sake.

It's been a gratifying journey this year, and I am so proud of these musicians. If balance is important to music, it is also important to life, and I have to balance the work we did with the outcome and realize that top 20% in a nation of school musicians is pretty good. When I think of each individual student's growth and the vast improvement of the whole group, I am overwhelmed. Balance that against the snapshot we present at this festival, and it all pretty much evens out.

C.A.M.P.

Curiosity, Affinity, Motivation, Perseverance.

These are the things I believe people need to succeed at anything, the Arts especially.

Every fall I start hundreds of curious students on band and orchestra instruments. I think that most of them have no idea what the endeavor they have undertaken really demands of them. They are just curious. That, and their friends signed up too. There are a few students at every school who have zero curiosity about playing a musical instrument. If the music instruction is compulsory, they go through the motions, barely, and I can only hope that something has sunk in when all is said and done, and that there will be some residual benefit to their brain development in spite of their lack of interest.

Within a few weeks, I can see the second thing on the list begin to manifest, or not. The students who have chosen an instrument they have affinity for, or those who have affinity for music in general begin to blossom. Their enthusiasm is what I live for. They are the students who run down the hall, across the playground to music class, bring me practice buckets full (more about this below) every week, who say "Yes!" when I say let's play Hot Cross Buns. They may not be the best players at first. Their love of playing may be way ahead of their skills and ability, at first.  The students whose initial Curiosity is their only impulse to play begin to falter, forgetting instruments at home, leaving them in the classroom all week, forgetting to come to class, or choosing to skip class. Some merely-curious students fake it for a while, but without the affinity, they don't last long.

It is in the second or even third year that the real motivation issues come up. Children who have the first two characteristics are self-motivated up to a point. Extrinsic motivations must also be present, in my opinion, to keep them going. Parental support, a growing sense of belonging to something cool, the thrill of performance are just three things that can motivate.

Where I have the most difficulty as a teacher is in this part of the equation. I'm not much for stickers or prizes or charts. What has been fun this year with the elementary students is the "Practice Bucket". It's a 4x4-inch paper with a bucket drawing on it. There are five lines inside that bucket. I tell the students they get to color one lined section for each 20 minute practice session. When they bring the colored buckets back, I hang them up on the wall. They are proud to see their buckets hanging there. (This comes from an idea I read somewhere that the work we do in class fills a small portion of a "bucket". If the students then go home and practice, the bucket fills up and we can move on to another "bucket". If they don't practice, not only does the bucket not fill up, but the work we did in class evaporates.) Even still, there are students who practice- as evidenced by their playing- who don't color their buckets. There are students who color buckets, but don't bring them back to school. And, of course, there are students for whom this is no motivation at all.

At the middle school, we use practice logs, and I started the year with a chart for each class. The class that got the most practice minutes by the end of the semester was going to have a pizza party. Great idea, but only about 3 students ever bothered to fill in and turn in their logs. They were practicing, or not, but the incentive of the pizza party was not enough to spur the lazy ones to practice, and the hard working ones didn't need that incentive. I have tried basing grades on this practice log, and still only get a handful of submissions. So, my part in Motivation remains mysterious to me. When it's there, it's there and when it's not, there's not much I can do, it seems.

The last letter in the acronym- P for Perseverance- is the one that carries the student into high school and beyond and leads to adults who enjoy making music for fun or profit. These are the kids who may have been great or mediocre or even terrible players in the beginning, but who kept coming to class, kept working- even a little- at home, who enjoyed being in concerts, who kept trying and are now maybe the leads in their marching band sections or who aspire to major in music in college. Maybe they are the last chair in the second violin section, but love being there. Maybe they get together with their friends and jam in the garage. Maybe they play in a community orchestra. Maybe they will be doctors or programmers or teachers or parents or join the military, and I believe they will succeed at any of those things, given enough C.A.M.P.